This post dates from May 5th 2011, and was written for my France24 blog - I'm now reposting all posts from there to this blog.
Today a lot of the media really think Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela
Merkel have cracked it, reporting that as soon as they've worked out a
few differences over eurobonds and the ECB, we'll be well on our way to a
fiscal union that will save the eurozone.
There's just a little problem here for Sarkozy, five months before an
election, that most of the French papers seem to be glossing over - how
on earth does he plan to sell this to French voters? A consolidated
fiscal and budgetary union with Germany means adopting the tax and
spending policies of a country that has raised its retirement age to 67,
actually pays higher income tax then the French (France tops up the
state's earnings through a fiendishly complicated system of national
insurance contributions) and has a great deal less regulation to protect
workers, including no minimum wage. 73% of voters polled by le Figaro
(their own readers, so the people you'd expect to back Sarkozy's plan)
said they supported the idea, which begs the question as to whether
they've thought about what it would entail - the government has been
pretty light on detail.
This is a country, remember, where the majority rejected the EU
constitution in 2005, which was far from radical, because they were
afraid of exactly this - deregulation, rule of the free markets, removal
of the safeguards in French labour law that make it so hard to fire
people - in short, Germanisation. That 'no' vote united a disparate
selection of voters, from the Front National to the Communist Party, but
their motivation was essentially a left wing one; the preservation of
French public services and workers' rights. Socialist presidential
candidate François Hollande has clearly calculated this is a demographic
worth pitching to. He made a speech this morning at the SDP party
congress in Berlin rejecting the idea of fiscal union and praising the
German philosopher Jurgen Habermas, who said the EU had created a
democratic deficit at the heart of Europe by moving decision making so
far away from its citizens; Merkel and Sarkozy are now set to dig that
gap a great deal deeper, as Hollande sees it. As Liberation
reported today, he hopes to create a socialist alternative to the
fiscal union plan - based on growth and investment rather than
austerity. This might be a hard sell in Berlin, where as today's les Echos
noted, SDP voters are more worried about being forced to create
eurobonds (a policy Hollande strongly backs) and thus provide a German
guarantee on Italian debt.
That doesn't mean his idea doesn't have echoes in other countries.
The Spanish and Italian left are already starting to raise doubts - El Pais today said Merkel was 'pushing so hard on the accelerator she's driving the union over a cliff' and La Repubblica
rejected Mario Monti's austerity budget as unfair and undemocratic. At
home, a French electorate long suspicious about the free market nature
of the EU is bound to find it more appealing than the Sarkozy
prescription for austerity. The problem is, if Hollande fuels voters'
Euroscepticism too much, he may push them towards his far left rival
Jean-Luc Melenchon, who's much more openly sceptical about
globalisation, or even to Marine le Pen.
Nicolas Sarkozy faces a similar risk - any sign he's handing too much
power over to Brussels or Berlin will panic a chunk of his electorate.
In creating the supposed magic bullet to save the eurozone this week, he
may have opened a can of worms that neither of the two main candidates
for the Elysee can actually close.

Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire